Skip to content

Conversation

@unity-renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@unity-renovate unity-renovate bot commented Feb 8, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Editor Change
com.unity.services.relay dependencies minor ✅ Compatible 1.0.5 -> 1.1.1

✅ Editor bump: Not required for testproject/Packages/manifest.json

This is probably safe to merge for this project


Release Notes

com.unity.services.relay (com.unity.services.relay)

v1.1.1

Compare Source

  • Added apple privacy manifest
  • Updated com.unity.services.core to 1.12.5
  • Updated com.unity.services.authentication to 2.7.4
  • Updated com.unity.services.qos to 1.3.2

v1.1.0

Compare Source

  • Generated the latest version of the API client with new constants for ConnectionType
  • Update QoS dependency to 1.3.0
  • Generate the latest version of the API client with new return code
  • Update License
  • Update Core dependency to 1.12.4
  • Change error handling to expose API errors

v1.0.5

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Unity Renovate Bot.

@unity-cla-assistant
Copy link

unity-cla-assistant commented Feb 8, 2025

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@unity-renovate unity-renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/develop-upm-prj-com.unity.services.relay-1.x branch from 09e7d88 to d00b673 Compare February 10, 2025 18:23
@unity-renovate
Copy link
Contributor Author

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: undefined
MSBuild version 17.7.6+77d58ec69 for .NET
  Determining projects to restore...
/opt/containerbase/tools/dotnet/sdk/7.0.410/Sdks/Microsoft.NET.Sdk/targets/Microsoft.NET.TargetFrameworkInference.targets(160,5): error NETSDK1045: The current .NET SDK does not support targeting .NET 8.0.  Either target .NET 7.0 or lower, or use a version of the .NET SDK that supports .NET 8.0. Download the .NET SDK from https://aka.ms/dotnet/download [/tmp/renovate/repos/github/Unity-Technologies/com.unity.netcode.gameobjects/Tools/CI/NGO.Cookbook.csproj]

@unity-renovate unity-renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/develop-upm-prj-com.unity.services.relay-1.x branch from d00b673 to 58649a1 Compare February 11, 2025 18:23
@unity-renovate
Copy link
Contributor Author

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

@unity-renovate unity-renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update upm project dependency com.unity.services.relay to v1.1.1 (develop) chore(deps): update upm project dependency com.unity.services.relay to v1.1.1 (develop) - abandoned Feb 19, 2025
@unity-renovate
Copy link
Contributor Author

Autoclosing Skipped

This PR has been flagged for autoclosing. However, it is being skipped due to the branch being already modified. Please close/delete it manually or report a bug if you think this is in error.

@michalChrobot michalChrobot deleted the renovate/develop-upm-prj-com.unity.services.relay-1.x branch February 19, 2025 08:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants